As the threat escalates, a publicly traded corporation continues to cut corners on IT security, relying on hope rather than defense.

The CISO? No influence. No budget. No team.

Now the few employees are sick, and no one cares.
The executive suite? Looking the other way.

Years of overload, zero recognition, no opportunities for development, and a management team lulled into a false sense of security. The risk is no longer hypothetical. When the last person on the security team is overwhelmed and drops out, everything comes to a standstill. And the attackers won’t wait.

Burnout has now become a security vulnerability in itself:

  • CISOs work an average of eleven hours of overtime per week.
  • 60% report acute burnout
  • Many leave the role after a few years. Burned out, discouraged, left alone.

What is the point of having a CISO if they don’t receive any real support? When will board members take responsibility instead of making excuses ?

The much-cited cyber security skills gap? In my opinion, it’s homemade.

It’s caused by decision-makers who prioritize incorrectly, downplay or ignore risks, and thus lose the very professionals they are desperately seeking.

Cyber security does not fail because of a lack of talent; it fails because of a lack of leadership.

Tags

Share post

More articles

The wiper blades on my leased vehicle were worn out.The car had been sitting for six months before I took delivery—low mileage,visibility is now limited. Lease includes maintenance & wear and tear; wiper blades are...
Many organisations trust that their own systems and applications “will be secure somehow”. Especially when third parties such as IT service providers or cloud services are used, the trust in IT security is great. Our...
I recently met a colleague who is CISO at a large corporation in Germany. In addition to all kinds of technical topics, at some point during the conversation we also got to talking about the...