As the threat escalates, a publicly traded corporation continues to cut corners on IT security, relying on hope rather than defense.

The CISO? No influence. No budget. No team.

Now the few employees are sick, and no one cares.
The executive suite? Looking the other way.

Years of overload, zero recognition, no opportunities for development, and a management team lulled into a false sense of security. The risk is no longer hypothetical. When the last person on the security team is overwhelmed and drops out, everything comes to a standstill. And the attackers won’t wait.

Burnout has now become a security vulnerability in itself:

  • CISOs work an average of eleven hours of overtime per week.
  • 60% report acute burnout
  • Many leave the role after a few years. Burned out, discouraged, left alone.

What is the point of having a CISO if they don’t receive any real support? When will board members take responsibility instead of making excuses ?

The much-cited cyber security skills gap? In my opinion, it’s homemade.

It’s caused by decision-makers who prioritize incorrectly, downplay or ignore risks, and thus lose the very professionals they are desperately seeking.

Cyber security does not fail because of a lack of talent; it fails because of a lack of leadership.

Tags

Share post

More articles

This question is often asked by novices who are dealing with ISO 27001 for the first time. What is an Internal Audit? An internal audit is a self-audit to verify three key points by an...
ISO 27001 requires you to conduct an internal audit of your ISMS on a regular basis to verify conformity with the standard. Although it is called an “internal audit”, you can – and should –...
In practice and in marketing, misleading terminology is often encountered in connection with information security standards such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2. This imprecise use not only leads to misunderstandings, but can also undermine...