As the threat escalates, a publicly traded corporation continues to cut corners on IT security, relying on hope rather than defense.

The CISO? No influence. No budget. No team.

Now the few employees are sick, and no one cares.
The executive suite? Looking the other way.

Years of overload, zero recognition, no opportunities for development, and a management team lulled into a false sense of security. The risk is no longer hypothetical. When the last person on the security team is overwhelmed and drops out, everything comes to a standstill. And the attackers won’t wait.

Burnout has now become a security vulnerability in itself:

  • CISOs work an average of eleven hours of overtime per week.
  • 60% report acute burnout
  • Many leave the role after a few years. Burned out, discouraged, left alone.

What is the point of having a CISO if they don’t receive any real support? When will board members take responsibility instead of making excuses ?

The much-cited cyber security skills gap? In my opinion, it’s homemade.

It’s caused by decision-makers who prioritize incorrectly, downplay or ignore risks, and thus lose the very professionals they are desperately seeking.

Cyber security does not fail because of a lack of talent; it fails because of a lack of leadership.

Tags

Share post

More articles

A serious vulnerability exists in the popular Samba server, which provides Windows file and print services in Linux environments. Linux systems should be updated as soon as possible, because the vulnerability with the identifier CVE-2020-27840...
This question is often asked by novices who are dealing with ISO 27001 for the first time. What is an Internal Audit? An internal audit is a self-audit to verify three key points by an...
One of the core competences of cloud service providers is the safeguarding of infrastructures with regard to IT security. But what should be taken into account when using the cloud? The cloud has many advantages:...